Scaling plans
Written by Paul Kohlmann Getting your model to the right size How-to As seen in the July 2017 issue of Model Aviation.
Times have never been better for scratch builders. Numerous plans services are publishing plans dating back to the 1930s and beyond. Many of the print wood kits from yesteryear are now available as laser-cut kits. And just a little surfing on the internet can produce a drawing of virtually any aircraft imaginable. One thing about builders is that we seem to thrive on personalizing our projects. Maybe we need to add a little more detail than what is found on the plans. Or perhaps we want to convert a scale model to a different variant. One of the most common modifications is to change the scale of the plans. Maybe that 19-inch Earl Stahl Grumman Wildcat got your attention, but it’s too small for the spare motor and servos you’d like to use. Or maybe you’d like a 1/8-scale Douglas Devastator to fit in with other models, but the best plans available are a different scale. I often hear from builders who are uncertain how to resize plans. It’s actually quite simple, but with that said, there are a few guidelines that come in handy.
What Scale Is This Model?
A common question that builders ask is what scale are these plans? This is particularly true when working with designers who group their designs by wingspan instead of by scale. Builders have good reasons for asking what scale their project will be. A key reason is to make sure that detail parts will be the right size. For example, pilot figures are usually described by their scale. Putting a 1/8-scale pilot in a 1/12-scale cockpit will look odd. As an example, I’m currently working on a Curtiss Hawk 75. The wingspan for this project will be 60 inches, but what scale is that? The math needed to answer this question is simple. We only need to know the wingspan of the model and the wingspan of the actual airplane.In the case of the Hawk, the full-scale aircraft had a wingspan of 37 feet, 4 inches. As mentioned, the model has a 60-inch wingspan. The first step is to get both of the wingspans into the same units—in this case either in feet or in inches. Let’s start by working in inches. There are 12 inches to a foot. With this knowledge, we can convert the full-scale wingspan into the same units as the plans. We need to convert the 37-foot part of the wingspan to inches. That extra 4-inch part of the wingspan is already in the right units, so we’ll add that bit on after the feet are converted. Here is how the conversion looks mathematically: Full-scale Hawk 75 wingspan = (37 feet x 12 inches) + 4 inches = 448 inches. Now that the full-scale units match the model units, all we need to do is find the ratio of the big airplane to the little airplane. We do this by dividing the full-scale wingspan by the model wingspan: Ratio of full-scale aircraft to model = 448 inches / 60 inches = 7.47. So, the scale is 1/7.47. This just happens to be 7% more than 1/7 scale and 7% less than 1/8 scale. There’s not a lot of 1/7-scale stuff out there, but 1/8 scale is pretty common. Is that a problem when we are looking for a pilot? Perhaps, but when you consider that full-scale Hawk pilots ranged in size from somewhere between 5 feet, 6 inches and 6 feet, 3 inches (coincidently a variation of +/-7%), we can probably make a 1/8-scale pilot work. A note on units: It doesn’t matter if the units are in feet, meters, or furlongs. The same process applies. First convert as necessary to get both the full-scale and the model into the same units, and then find the ratio.
Scaling Plans Up or Down
A different scaling challenge is changing the size of the project. For scratch builders, that normally means changing the size of the printed plans and the parts outlines. Digital printing has made this a simple thing. As an example, let’s adjust that aforementioned 19-inch Stahl Wildcat to an even 30 inches. The ratio of the 30-inch model to the original 19-inch one is 1.58. All we need to do is print our plans 158% larger.The Earl Stahl Wildcat is a FF classic, but with only a 19-inch wingspan, it might be smaller than some builders are looking for.
Most of us don’t have a large-format printer of our own, but many printing resources do. These include copy centers, local blueprint shops, and online printing services. Most can change the scale of your printout if you explain your goals. The AMA Plans Service can also provide plans that are larger or smaller than the original. For larger plans, blueprint shops can be your best bet. They often have larger machines than copy centers have and they are more focused on technical drawings rather than flyers. My local shop costs slightly more, but its service is excellent. The 36 x 48 plans for my last project were less than $10 a copy. Even if you don’t have a large-format printer at home, you can still print your own plans on a standard printer. This is done by tiling the file. Tiling simply breaks the large page down into standard letter-size sheets. The sheets are then taped together to make full-size plans. I use Adobe Acrobat Pro for this, but there are several tools available online. Some file types scale more easily than others. CAD formats such as DWG and DXF are designed to be scaled up and down. An important benefit of these formats is that their line widths and resolution don’t degrade as the scale is blown up. A PDF file works nearly as well, with high levels of resolution, but the line width will vary with the scale. Graphics files such as JPEG and TIFF are a little trickier. The resolution of these formats degrades as the scale goes up. That means that a letter-size sheet gets mighty fuzzy by the time it is blown up to big plans.
Scaling a Design Up or Down
Now that we know that changing the size of the drawing is simple, we can make any size model from any plans, right? Well, not exactly. There are a few things to work out first. The first thing to consider is the thickness of the materials you will be working with. When the scale changes, so does the thickness of the stock. To get this section started, here is a list of standard wood thicknesses in inches. As a side note, please be aware that the actual thickness of balsa varies.Fractional | Decimal |
1/32 | 0.031 |
1/16 | 0.063 |
3/32 | 0.094 |
1/8 | 0.125 |
3/16 | 0.188 |
1/4 | 0.250 |
3/8 | 0.375 |
1/2 | 0.500 |
How Far Can We Go?
As a rough guideline, the size of most plans can be doubled or cut in half and still made to work. The limiting factor is whether the structure will still be effective at the new size. I’ll illustrate my point by driving this to an extreme. Let’s consider scaling the Stahl Free Flight (FF) Wildcat up to a 1/4-scale monster. We’ll do a little more math to figure out the scaling factor: • Stahl Wildcat wingspan = 19 inches • 1/4-scale wingspan = 38 feet (the full-scale wingspan) / 4 = 9.5 feet. • Convert 1/4 wingspan to inches = 9.5 feet * 12 = 114 inches. • Scale factor = 114 inches / 19 inches = 6.0. The fuselage of the original Stahl design uses eight 1/16-inch formers spaced roughly 2 inches apart. These formers are tied together by six 1/16-inch square stringers that appear to be reasonably close together in the model. After multiplying these values by 6.0, our upscaled Wildcat will be built with chunky 3/8-inch thick formers spaced more than a foot apart. A better plan would be to use a greater number of thinner formers. As for the stringers, the upscaled version now has bulky 3/8-inch square stringers that are spaced inches apart. The structure that worked well as a tiny FF model now looks like a loosely associated collection of lumber.Here’s a look at the tiling and scaling functions in Adobe Acrobat Pro.
Another complication comes when fitting motors and other hardware. Builders who choose to make large-scale changes on a set of plans need to consider whether the framework is designed to handle the loads it will see as a larger or smaller model. Modifications to motor mounts, battery trays, etc., could also be required. These concerns aren’t meant to rule out radical adjustments to existing plans. They are simply offered to show that builders who successfully take on these projects do more than print a bigger piece of paper and buy thicker wood.
7 comments
Thank you!
Scaling plans.
Really good subject. Thank
I made a mistake a few years
Scaling plans
Dear Sir/Madam,
drawings prebalsacut fir Convair Metropolitan 440
Add new comment